Technical writer review, on demand

Automated technical writer review for government proposals — surfaces compliance drift, misaligned evaluation-criteria framing, weak claim-evidence pairing, and page-limit issues before your human reviewers see the draft.

What the review checks

• Every Section L "shall" and "must" is addressed in the draft.
• Each response section maps to the Section M evaluation criteria.
• Claims are paired with evidence — no unsupported assertions.
• Active voice, benefit-first framing, government-appropriate register.
• Page-limit adherence per section.
• Format conformance: fonts, margins, page numbers, section labeling.

Where review fits in the workflow

Run a review pass between each color team — pink, red, and gold — to catch compliance drift as the draft evolves. It complements the AI proposal generator and pairs with the human reviews described in pink, red, and gold team reviews. Most losses trace to a compliance gap — see why proposals get rejected.